President Obama Seeks Revenge.

There have been many sick moments during the current campaign, but President Obama earned first prize in Ohio.

During a campaign appearance in Ohio, while

in the middle of an attack on Mitt Romney he told a crowd at a campaign rally to stop booing and, ” Vote! Voting’s the best revenge!”

Is he already inciting his supporter to riot if he loses?

Here is a definition of “Revenge

1. to avenge (as oneself) usually by retaliating in kind or degree

2. to inflict injury in return for an insult

Examples of REVENGE:

a man who took matters into his own hands and revenged the death of his brother

What has Governor Romney done to the denizens of Ohio for which they should seek revenge? I haven’t been able to think of anything that he might already have done to them. Perhaps President Obama had in mind the terrible things that he hopes his supporters believe will happen to them if he is not reelected. Anticipatory revenge is an unusual concept, but President Obama may have remembered the great foresight of the Nobel Prize Committee in awarding him an anticipatory Peace Prize; he had done nothing noteworthy in the cause of world peace to warrant it, but the Committee evidently thought that he eventually would. That might explain his own request for anticipatory revenge on Governor Romney for the bad things he hopes his supporters believe he may do to them if elected. However, to the extent that it was extemporaneous, his request for revenge seems unlikely to have been a product of that degree of reflection and introspection.

His call for revenge may well have been  a Freudian slip,

a slip of the tongue in which a word that the speaker was subconsciously thinking about is substituted for the one that he or she meant to say.

In any event, it is probable that President Obama sought revenge by his supporters on his own behalf for the great insults heaped upon him by Governor Romney’s campaign: Governor Romney insulted him by daring blasphemously to challenge one so historically great, rather than show proper deference by bowing down before him. Incitements of that nature might be suitable for an ancient Norse God or an absolute monarch; the presidency does not, at least yet, confer such majesty upon a temporary holder of the office.

Breitbart says and I agree,

What kind of divisive, ugly rhetoric is this coming from a sitting president? It’s easy to sympathize with the fact that Obama’s record gives few reasons for anyone to vote for him; and that for that reason, he’s been forced to attempt to destroy his opponent with a half-billion dollars in negative ads — but now the President of the United States is publicly telling a crowd of Americans to vote for revenge. And not just revenge, but revenge against another American.

But what else are we to expect from a president who spent weeks on binders, Big Bird, birth control, and bull shit — the president whose surrogates have used the word “felon” to describe Romney and accused him of murder?

This behavior isn’t just unpresdiential, it’s un-American. (Italic emphasis added, bold emphasis in original.)

Governor Romney could have responded somewhat in kind, not by seeking revenge for insults to himself by President Obama and his supporters, but for the damage President Obama and his administration have inflicted upon the entire nation over the past nearly four years. He did not do that. Instead he said,

Pres Obama asked his supporters to vote for revenge. Instead I ask the American people to vote for love of country.

Here’s the composite Librul response I imagine. Perhaps the Daily Commie will republish it.

Love of country indeed! What a backward looking relic of the wicked past! They want to restore slavery and send innocents back to the fields to pick cotton. Just listen to those ignorant, jingoistic savages who delude themselves that there was ever something — anything — good, exceptional or worth preserving in the so called “United States of America” before President Obama came unto us!

They ignore our fair and balanced mass media as they cower with their vast riches in their huge money vaults reading scurrilous misinformation on the internet.

They loudly and repeatedly chant USA! USA! Savage brutes, how dare they! The USA? A country of homophobes and Islamaphobes, such as themselves, that rejects gay marriage and adherence to the only True Religion of Peace! They want to deprive even the poor of their choices to have free contraceptives and abortions. Hateful misogynists! How our beloved composite Julia and our poor little Sandra Fluke must despise them, as do we all! They reject the blessings of universal free stuff. They refused to understand that dependence on a benign Government is the solution to our problems, all of which spring from the festering roots of antiquated independence. They even want to fire our beloved President Obama! Any Librul worthy of the treasures This Nation Under Obama generously bestows upon him must find such inane drivel worse than merely disgusting.

Before President Obama appeared nobly on the scene in a blaze of glorious light and the dark clouds covering the entire world parted, the nation was a White, rich, racist, divided and imperialistic collection of insufferable jerks. Under His wise leadership, the United States ceased to be wickedly rich and became less divided. Under President Obama, the military transitioned from a vile messenger of death, destruction and hatred into a powerful force for universal peace, multicultural understanding, love and social restoration; members of His military now organize communities rather than destroy them. He has converted our foreign enemies into friends and has spread true democracy to the four corners of the Earth. Our great ObamaNation has welcomed countless thousands of differently-documented immigrants as they come freely across her borders to do work that Americans refuse to do, should not have to do and that a grateful nation pays them for not doing.

Yet there is much more for Him to do. When He came unto us, there was great hope that White racism might diminish. Lately, it has instead revived with a vengeance. Even President Obama’s sweet little son, Trayvon, was brutally murdered by a vile racist — just because he hated Blacks. Even some Whites who sought to put their racist shame behind them by voting to elect President Obama in 2008 are now backsliding into racism and may, for that reason alone, vote for Governor Romney this year.

USA! USA! indeed. Gun totin’ Bible thumpin’ racist redneck scum every one of them. They had better watch out because, when given the second term He truly deserves, President Obama should and must seek revenge against them. They have more than earned it. If President Obama is unfairly deprived of His opportunity to continue His good works to benefit us all, we may be forced to seek revenge ourselves.

My composite Librul might be right, at least about revenge during President Obama’s second term or even if he does not get one.

UPDATE: At least one Democrat in North Carolina wants more than his fair share of revenge.  He has already voted four times and plans to vote some more. What a great, patriotic guy!

About danmillerinpanama

I was graduated from Yale University in 1963 with a B.A. in economics and from the University of Virginia School of law, where I was the notes editor of the Virginia Law Review in 1966. Following four years of active duty with the Army JAG Corps, with two tours in Korea, I entered private practice in Washington, D.C. specializing in communications law. I retired in 1996 to sail with my wife, Jeanie, on our sailboat Namaste to and in the Caribbean. In 2002, we settled in the Republic of Panama and live in a very rural area up in the mountains. I have contributed to Pajamas Media and Pajamas Tatler. In addition to my own blog, Dan Miller in Panama, I an an editor of Warsclerotic and contribute to China Daily Mail when I have something to write about North Korea.
This entry was posted in 2016 Obama's America, Abortion, Abuse of Power, Birth control, Conservatives, Democracy, Democrats, Dove of peace, Elections, Free Press, Good stuff for everone free, Government and individual choices, Government reliance, Governor Romney, Health Control, Ideology, Idiocy, Illegal immigration, Internet, Julia, Military, Money, Muslims, Negative ads, Obama, Obama Dream Order, Obama Ohio Speech, Peace and Love, Political Correctness, Politics, presidential, Racism, Reporting, Romney, United States, Voting, War on women and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to President Obama Seeks Revenge.

  1. Rwolf says:

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest American Militias?

    Could Obama use NDAA To Arrest Militias on the Premise members are Militants and Belligerents that pose a threat to National Security?

    Recently the Obama administration stated to Federal Judge Katherine Forest that under (NDAA) The National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 the President had authorization to lock up belligerents indefinitely. That they (were justified) to lock belligerents up indefinitely—because cases involving belligerents directly-aligned with militants against the good of America—warrants such punishment.) Pres. Obama could use NDAA provisions to order U.S. Military Forces to round up without evidence, millions of Americans including militias by alleging they are belligerents or a threat to National Security. Many observers believe Obama intends to extend NDAA to imprison U.S. Citizens in Indefinite Detention not involved with or associated with enemy forces.

    Hitler included similar provisions in his fascist (Discriminatory Decrees signed February 28, 1933). Almost immediately after the German Parliament passed Hitler’s laws, the Reich Government ordered the arrest of German Citizens and confiscated their guns without probable cause or evidence; delegated powers to German Police and other authorities to arrest anyone Nazi authorities claimed attempted or incited public unrest: arrested among others were outspoken Germans, writers, journalists, peaceful protestors and artists. After World War II the East German Secret Police (Stasi) used the threat of Indefinite Detention to forcibly recruit thousands of informants.

    The U.S. 2012 NDAA legislation Obama signed 12-31-11 is similar to Hitler’s 1933 fascist laws the SS and Gestapo used to target persons in Germany for arrest, imprisonment and execution without probable cause; and confiscate millions of dollars of property. Hitler used his laws to suspend Parliament and the Supreme Court insuring his laws could not be rescinded.

    During the Obama Administration’s recent request for a (stay) to stop U.S. District Judge Katherine Forrest blocking enforcement of vague NDAA provisions, the Obama Administration—never clarified what constitutes a (belligerent); or militant; or what belligerent activities (directly aligned with a militant) to order a belligerent’s arrest or indefinite detention; or what is against the good of America. Under vague provisions of NDAA, the President could accuse anyone of being (directly aligned with militants by way of any political or other association; activity, statement, writing or communication with an individual or group government deemed (militant) to arrest and indefinitely detain Americans. Writers, journalists, Americans that disagree with or question U.S. Government or its allies—may under NDAA be subject to arrest and indefinite detention.

    NDAA 2012, like Hitler’s 1933 Discriminatory Decrees enforces censorship; refers to the Patriot Act e.g. warrant-less searches of private property and forfeiture of property from persons not charged with crime. Provisions in NDAA 2012 keep the door open for corrupt U.S. police; government agents and provocateurs which there are many, to falsify reports and statements to target any American, group or organization for arrest, indefinite detention, complete disappearance; civil asset forfeiture of their property.

    You may have noted NDAA referred to the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act lends itself to Government / police corruption; the Federal Government may use secret witnesses and informants to cause arrests and civil asset forfeiture of Americans’ property. Witness(s) and informants may be paid up to 50% of assets forfeited. Federal Government under 18USC may use a mere preponderance of civil evidence, little more than hearsay to Civilly Forfeit Private Property. Under the Patriot Act innocent property owners may be barred by government knowing the evidence federal government uses to forfeit their property.

    Sections of NDAA 2012 are so broad, it appears U.S. Government or the President could (retroactively) deem an American’s past 1st Amendment activities prior to passage of 2012 NDAA—supported hostilities, terrorism or (Belligerents) to order the arrest and Indefinite Detention of any U.S. Citizen, writer, group or organization.

    Under NDAA 2012 it should be expected that indefinitely detained U.S. Citizens not involved in terrorism or hostile activities, not given Miranda Warnings when interrogated, not allowed legal counsel or habeas corpus may be prosecuted for non-terrorist (ordinary crimes) because of their (alleged admissions) while held in Indefinite Detention.

  2. Pingback: Opinion Forum » President Obama Seeks Revenge

  3. Pingback: » President Obama Seeks Revenge. » Tea Party Tribune

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s