Government Intimidation Is Protected By Law

Our system of governance was not initially intended to foster and protect the intimidation of private citizens by their – our – “public servants.” It was initially intended to do the opposite. However, it was not initially intended to do many if not most of the other things it now does either.

Jim quite rightly assigns much of the blame to the Administrative Procedure Act. However, the effects of the APA are greatly enhanced by many subsequent acts of Congress (and even some Executive Decrees Orders that have given too many Federal agencies too much discretion to do too many inadequately specified things. Congress tends to assign to agencies the tasks of implementing ill thought-out legislation with such language as “taking such other actions and adopting such other regulations as the Administrator may deem appropriate.” The mass of HHS ObamaCare regulations continues to become greater, already reaching, I understand, ten thousand pages. The Internal Revenue Service has been charged with implementing much of ObamaCare not to be implemented directly by HHS. Binding IRS interpretations of IRS regulations will follow as those regulations are adopted and implemented.

I offered a small example of the nature of the beast in an article about The Safe Teen and Novice Driver Uniform Protection Act. If enacted (it died in committee) it would have authorized

Any other requirement adopted by the Secretary of Transportation, including learner’s permit holding period at least 6 months; intermediate stage at least 6 months; at least 30 hours behind-the-wheel, supervised driving by licensed driver 21 years of age or older; automatic delay of full licensure if permit holder commits an offense, such as DWI, misrepresentation of true age, reckless driving, unbelted driving, speeding, or other violations as determined by the Secretary. (Emphasis added)

When I practiced communications law in Washington, I was often involved in Federal Communications Commission cases before the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, charged by statute with hearing appeals from most FCC rulings. That court, which I still regard as one of the best in the nation, had no choice but to defer to findings of fact by “experts” at the FCC as well as to the expansive but inadequately defined authority granted to them by legislation.

Occasionally, I glance at Yahoo News to learn what’s happening outside the sadly lunatic world of politics. There was recently an article titled Why is there so much poop in swimming pools? Swimming pools were not intended to serve as toilets or septic tanks but it seems that too many do. It strikes me that our Federal Government has promoted more growth of dangerous bacteria that dine upon our freedoms than all swimming pools have become infested with “E. Coli, the bacteria most commonly associated with fecal matter.”

We’ve come a long way baby, and it’s getting pretty dark and scary. Shouldn’t we stop going “forward” and head on home?

Asylum Watch

Many of us, at one time or another, have seen the truth of the adage: You can’t fight City Hall.  And, too many of our fellow citizens ave learned the hard way that fighting abuse of power by some federal bureaucrats is even worse than trying to fight City Hall.

Judge Andrew Napolitano is famous for asking the question: Does the government work for us, or do we work for the government? The truth is that most American taxpayers work a large part of their lives just to pay for government. Worse, however, is that often times your government works against you and sometimes they work against you illegally. When that happens, you have legal redress, right? You have rights protected by the constitution to due process and a speedy trial, right? Well, you can go bankrupt trying to get your rights enforced against a rogue bureaucrat that is…

View original post 545 more words

Advertisements

About danmillerinpanama

I was graduated from Yale University in 1963 with a B.A. in economics and from the University of Virginia School of law, where I was the notes editor of the Virginia Law Review in 1966. Following four years of active duty with the Army JAG Corps, with two tours in Korea, I entered private practice in Washington, D.C. specializing in communications law. I retired in 1996 to sail with my wife, Jeanie, on our sailboat Namaste to and in the Caribbean. In 2002, we settled in the Republic of Panama and live in a very rural area up in the mountains. I have contributed to Pajamas Media and Pajamas Tatler. In addition to my own blog, Dan Miller in Panama, I an an editor of Warsclerotic and contribute to China Daily Mail when I have something to write about North Korea.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s