Obama weakens America on Iran, takes offence when weakness is criticised

Obama supporters are shocked! It’s disgraceful that a mere Israeli Defense Minister should say unpleasant things about the Dear Leader.

Now PM Netanyahu and Defense Minister Ya’alon have

ordered the army to continue preparing for a possible military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities at a cost of at least 10 billion shekels ($2.89 billion) this year, despite the talks between Iran and the West, according to recent statements by senior military officers.

What will the Dear Leader’s supporters say about that? Will they find it insulting?

A large (83 member) and strongly bipartisan collection of U.S. Senators has sent a letter to President Obama challenging His policies toward Iran. Three hundred and ninety five members of the House have sent a similar letter.

The House letter goes into greater detail on verification of any deal while the Senate is more specific about the requirements needed to disable Iran’s illicit nuclear weapons program. The gist of the letters, however, is the same: Congress will in essence need to approve any final deal because legislative action is needed to lift sanctions; a final deal must disable Iran’s capacity to build a nuclear weapon; and stringent verification must be agreed to.

A bipartisan consensus of that magnitude should, but probably won’t, encourage even the hardest of the hard core Obama supporters to reconsider their positions.


Bryan Preston at PJ Media observes in an article titled Kerry Decides that Now’s as Good a Time as Any to Chew Out the Israelis,

US Secretary of State John Kerry decided that he would demonstrate strength by calling up Israel’s prime minister to tell on Ya’alon

“Secretary Kerry spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu this morning. And he protested to him his concerns about these comments,” State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told reporters Wednesday.

The U.S., Psaki reaffirmed, maintains an “unshakable commitment” to Israel’s security. [Emphasis added.]

How can something that no longer exists be “shaken?”

“So it is certainly confusing to us why Defense Minister Ya’alon would continue his pattern of making comments that don’t accurately represent the scope of our close partnership on a range of security issues and on the enduring partnership between the United States and Israel,” she said.

Campaign hack Psaki may find all this confusing, but it’s straightforward to anyone who has followed US-Israel relations, and Obama’s treatment of the Iranian nuclear standoff, since 2009. Obama has tilted toward Islamist groups from the Palestinian territories to Cairo to Syria and beyond, quite consistently. He has at the same time criticized Israel over settlements, tried to force it to accept indefensible borders, and publicly slighted its leaders. He has taken America’s positions of leadership in so many areas and thrown them away.

It all adds up to, as Ya’alon notes, Israel not being able to depend on the United States anymore. [Emphasis added.]

Who with a sense of self-preservation can depend on the U.S. now?

Anne's Opinions

Israeli Defence Minister Moshe “Bogie” Yaalon has done it again.  He pointed out that the American emperor has no clothes regarding Iran – and once again (as happened in January) the overly-sensitive Americans have taken offence.

Yaalon remarked that Israel cannot rely on the Americans when it comes to dealing with Iran, adding that Israel will have to rely on itself:

Israel’s Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon issued a scathing critique of the Obama administration, an Israeli newspaper reported Monday, declaring that Israel cannot rely on the US to thwart Iran’s nuclear program, accusing the administration of broadcasting weakness throughout the world, and warning that its perceived weakness was inviting further terrorism against US targets.
Speaking at a Tel Aviv University event on Sunday reported by the Haaretz daily, Ya’alon said Israel could not afford to rely on the Obama administration to lead an action against Iran’s nuclear program, and that…

View original post 689 more words


About danmillerinpanama

I was graduated from Yale University in 1963 with a B.A. in economics and from the University of Virginia School of law, where I was the notes editor of the Virginia Law Review in 1966. Following four years of active duty with the Army JAG Corps, with two tours in Korea, I entered private practice in Washington, D.C. specializing in communications law. I retired in 1996 to sail with my wife, Jeanie, on our sailboat Namaste to and in the Caribbean. In 2002, we settled in the Republic of Panama and live in a very rural area up in the mountains. I have contributed to Pajamas Media and Pajamas Tatler. In addition to my own blog, Dan Miller in Panama, I an an editor of Warsclerotic and contribute to China Daily Mail when I have something to write about North Korea.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Obama weakens America on Iran, takes offence when weakness is criticised

  1. Ruvy Kossover says:

    Apparently, Ya’alon only stated the obvious. Fifty-five years ago, it would have been the equivalent to saying that Brigitte Bardot was stacked… You just casn’t miss the reality.

    Dan, for how long have I warned that America would ABANDON Israel. They have. Good riddance. We can do without them!

  2. anneinpt says:

    A bipartisan consensus of that magnitude should, but probably won’t, encourage even the hardest of the hard core Obama supporters to reconsider their positions.

    That puts paid to all the nasty rumours that the US doesn’t support Israel any more. Of course this support and the anti-Iran deal sentiment is also in their own self-interest, but are they able to override the presidential veto? How much power do the Obamists have within Congress and the Senate?

    • Keep in mind that although good, only letters were sent; nothing more. No legislation has been passed, and no veto-proof legislation is likely to be passed. Even if well drafted legislation were to be enacted and sustained over President Obama’s veto, the chances are probably better than even that He would ignore it and do as He pleases.

      If the matter were to get into the judicial system (not easy), a final decision could not be expected for years, well after the damage had been done and become extraordinarily difficult to repair. Jonathan Turley, an attorney and liberal in the old-fashioned sense of the word whom I admire, recently testified before the House Judiciary Committee on executive overreach and the substantial problems of dealing with it. His testimony is lengthy and appropriately lawyer-like, but explains the situation and problems lucidly. It is well worth reading.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s