Wearing American patriotic garb prohibited on a foreign holiday

Feminists demand that men learn not to rape so that suggestive attire can be worn safely. Hispanics in California demanded that high school students not be permitted to wear patriotic attire so that Hispanics wouldn’t feel offended and perhaps become violent. The school complied. A Federal District Court and a majority of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with the Hispanics.

Lucy psych

According to this Rutherford Institute press release, it has asked the Supreme Court to

reject a lower court ruling that declared it unsafe for California public school students to wear American flag t-shirts to school. In asking the Supreme Court to hear the case of Dariano v. Morgan Hill, in which several students were ordered by school officials to cover up their American flag t-shirts on May 5, 2010, allegedly because officials feared that other students celebrating the Mexican holiday Cinco de Mayo would be offended, Rutherford Institute attorneys note that the school should have focused on controlling unruly students and not on stifling patriotic speech protected by the First Amendment. [Emphasis added.]

. . . .

On May 5, 2010, three Live Oak High School students wore patriotic t-shirts, shorts and shoes to school bearing various images of the U.S. flag. During a mid-morning “brunch break,” the students were approached by Assistant Principal Miguel Rodriguez, who told the students they could not wear their pro-U.S.A. shirts and gave them the option of either removing their shirts or turning them inside out. The students refused, believing the options to be disrespectful to the flag. Rodriguez allegedly lectured the group about Cinco de Mayo, indicating that he had received complaints from some Hispanic students about the stars and stripes apparel, and again ordered that the clothing be covered up to prevent offending the Hispanic students on “their” day. Principal Nick Boden also met with the parents and students and affirmed Rodriguez’s order, allegedly because he did not want to offend students who were celebrating Cinco de Mayo. [Emphasis added.[

The Rutherford Institute filed suit in Federal court.

In November 2011, the district court ruled in favor of school officials, citing a concern for school safety. That ruling was affirmed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in February 2014. Although the appeals court acknowledged that other students were permitted to wear Mexican flag colors and symbols, it ruled that school officials could forbid the American flag apparel out of concerns that it would cause disruption, even though no disruption had occurred. Three of the nine judges on the Ninth Circuit agreed with The Rutherford Institute that school officials violated long-standing Supreme Court precedent forbidding suppression of protected expression on the basis of a “heckler’s veto,” which occurs when the government restricts an individual’s right to free speech in order to maintain order.[Emphasis added.]

Leaving aside the obvious questions of where the loyalties of the “offended” and therefore potentially violent Hispanic students lie and whether they should become American citizens, how far will “our” courts and bureaucrats go to penalize free speech which is consistent with “American” values? Or perhaps I should refer to them as former American values since they don’t embrace politically correct attitudes. Has multiculturalism become a — or even the —  dominant feature in American culture and law?

I don’t have answers to the questions posed above. Perhaps the Supreme Court will resolve the legal matter in favor of those who prefer the First Amendment to multiculturalism. Or perhaps it won’t bother because a decision adverse to Hispanic interests would be politically incorrect and therefore opposed to “progressive” barbarism.

You may want to skip to 1:40 on the next video.

Oh well. It was. Would the U.S. Army Band and Chorus perform it today? Would it be considered subversive? On the Cinco de Mayo or other Hispanic holidays?


About danmillerinpanama

I was graduated from Yale University in 1963 with a B.A. in economics and from the University of Virginia School of law, where I was the notes editor of the Virginia Law Review in 1966. Following four years of active duty with the Army JAG Corps, with two tours in Korea, I entered private practice in Washington, D.C. specializing in communications law. I retired in 1996 to sail with my wife, Jeanie, on our sailboat Namaste to and in the Caribbean. In 2002, we settled in the Republic of Panama and live in a very rural area up in the mountains. I have contributed to Pajamas Media and Pajamas Tatler. In addition to my own blog, Dan Miller in Panama, I an an editor of Warsclerotic and contribute to China Daily Mail when I have something to write about North Korea.
This entry was posted in Apathy, Appeasement, Bill of Rights, Bill Whittle, Brain washing, Cinco de Mayo, Conservatives, Constitution, Courts, Democracy, Discrimination, Education, Eurabia, Fairness, free speech, Freedom, Illegal immigration, integration into society, Multicuralism, Obama, Obama Nation, Political Correctness, Politics and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Wearing American patriotic garb prohibited on a foreign holiday

  1. Terry Paul Truxillo says:

    Well seeing as to the facts; I was born in the United States of America,
    I served in the United States Navy,
    GIVEN DAY!!!

  2. Centinel2012 says:

    Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
    If you don’t like what you find here then maybe you should just leave and find someplace else to life, maybe even where you came from would better better than some place the offends you!

  3. MaddMedic says:

    Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word… and commented:
    This is America? Damn….

  4. Tom Carter says:

    I remember this silliness about the “flagshirts” from back when it happened. Seems to me there are only a couple of reasonable policies the school administration could adopt. First, ban all forms of clothing showing flags (or representations that imply flags) for all students. That would seem to be legal, given the need to maintain order and discipline. Or, permit clothing that shows flags for everyone all the time. If neither can be done because of the threat of violence, the problem isn’t about flags — it’s about criminal behavior by students, and that should be dealt with for what it is.

    The best solution, which works always, is school uniforms. That solves lots of problems, and all you have to worry about are smaller issues like making some of the boys pull their pants up over their asses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s