Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam

All the “news” that is fit to print serves Obama.

Islamic pig

In keeping with Obama’s policy and practice of pressuring “legitimate news media” to follow His desires vis a vis news coverage (see generally Sharyl Attkisson’s Stonewalled), Josh Earnest announced on January 12th:

President Barack Obama has a moral responsibility to push back on the nation’s journalism community when it is planning to publish anti-jihadi articles that might cause a jihadi attack against the nation’s defense forces, the White House’s press secretary said Jan. 12. [Emphasis added.]

“The president … will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessary to try to advocate for the safety and security of our men and women in uniform” whenever journalists’ work may provoke jihadist attacks, spokesman Josh Earnest told reporters at the White House’s daily briefing.[Emphasis added.]

The unprecedented reversal of Americans’ civil-military relations, and of the president’s duty to protect the First Amendment, was pushed by Earnest as he tried to excuse the administration’s opposition in 2012 to the publication of anti-jihadi cartoons by the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo. [Emphasis added.]

 

Here’s what Obama said on January 7th about the Islamic jihad attacks in France. Please note that He expressed approval of a free press and mentioned terrorism, but mentioned neither jihad nor Islam, “radical,” “extremist” or any other flavor.

Earnest’s January 12 statement, generally not reported by the “legitimate news media,” is a masterpiece of ambiguity and hence of obfuscation. Hence, we will have to wait to learn what “anti-jihadi” means, how and under what circumstances Obama, in His capacity as President and Commander in Chief of active duty U.S. armed forces, and His minions, will know in advance which media organizations are planning to publish what material and what tactics He will employ if expressing His views is insufficient.

What, in Obama’s view, are “jihadi” activities? Are they un-Islamic?

What types of “anti-jihadi articles” “might cause a jihadi attack against our nation’s armed forces”? Those criticizing Muslim attacks on members of the U.S. or allied military forces? Those criticizing Muslim slaughter of Christians, Jews and other non-Muslims? Those critical of Sharia law? Those critical of a Muslim clerics, perhaps Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ali Khamenei, or its President, Rouhani (also a cleric)? Those critical of a nuclear deal with Iran? Those critical of Mohamed and/or Allah? Those critical of Islam in general — perhaps televised interviews with Ayaan Hirsi Ali or with other apostates from Islam? Interviews with reformist Muslims, such as Egyptian President Sisi? Any of these, as well as others casting even minimal aspersions on the “religion of peace” might (or might not) have that effect.

Would media reports about attacks on members of  U.S. or allied military by forces of the Islamic State and its various cohorts fit within Obama’s parameters? Since the Islamic State, et al, are “not Islamic,” perhaps Obama does not consider such attacks to be true jihad.

How about reports of “anti-Muslim” backlash? Obama most likely wants as many as quickly as possible, whether real or imagined.

When the media rushes to print interviews with Muslims claiming to suddenly be terrified of an imaginary backlash, it is marginalizing and silencing the real victims of Muslim violence who have been the subjects of a Muslim assault for over a thousand years complete with literal lashings.

Earnest threatened that Obama will “will not now be shy about expressing a view or taking the steps that are necessaryto restrain the media. That suggests that if, after expressing His views, a media outlet does not oblige Him, He will take additional steps. How? What? Ms. Attkisson provided many examples of what His administration has done to make media accede to His views on what should be reported and how, and what should not be reported. For example, Government employees have been instructed to refuse or restrict access to journalists out of favor with the Obama administration, they have been excluded from photo ops and other, more important, events and, if Ms. Attkisson is correct, as I think she is, her computers and those of others less than favorable to Obama have sometimes been hacked and their other electronic devices have been tampered with by Government agents. “That’s a nice newspaper/radio station/television station you have there. I sure hope nothing unfortunate happens to it.”

Whatever Earnest may mean and whatever Obama may intend, the ambiguous warning to the media — even standing alone and even without further public clarification — seems likely to have an unwholesome restraining effect on what is reported about Islam and how.

 

 

Advertisements

About danmillerinpanama

I was graduated from Yale University in 1963 with a B.A. in economics and from the University of Virginia School of law, where I was the notes editor of the Virginia Law Review in 1966. Following four years of active duty with the Army JAG Corps, with two tours in Korea, I entered private practice in Washington, D.C. specializing in communications law. I retired in 1996 to sail with my wife, Jeanie, on our sailboat Namaste to and in the Caribbean. In 2002, we settled in the Republic of Panama and live in a very rural area up in the mountains. I have contributed to Pajamas Media and Pajamas Tatler. In addition to my own blog, Dan Miller in Panama, I an an editor of Warsclerotic and contribute to China Daily Mail when I have something to write about North Korea.
This entry was posted in Abuse of Power, Appeasement, Bill of Rights, Cartoonophobia, Charlie Hedbo, Christians, Commander in Chief, Constitution, Egypt, Federal Agencies, Foreign policy, Free Press, Freedom, Freedom of religion, Human rights, Iran, Islam, Islamic Caliphate, Islamic Jihad, Islamic slaughter, Islamic State, Islamists, Islamophobia, Jews, Khamenei, Korans, Media, Media-morphing, Middle East, Multicuralism, Muslims, Nuclear weapons, Obama, Obama Nation, Religion, Religion of death, Religion of peace, Reporting, Rouhani, Sharia law, U.S. Military and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam

  1. Pingback: “Extremist” Islam is not extreme. |

  2. Pingback: “Extremist” Islam is not extreme. | danmillerinpanama

  3. Pingback: A thought experiment about Islam |

  4. Pingback: A thought experiment about Islam |

  5. Sally Tudor says:

    Reblogged this on Sallys Political Page and commented:
    Go to hell Obama!! You will not DICTATE what we do or say! This is America NOT Africa, or any other communist hell hole!! You and Islam can go to HELL!

  6. Tom Carter says:

    Obama’s responses to islamic terrorism, including this most recent situation in Paris, has always troubled me. His attitude toward the press and freedom of speech is alarming. However, as he himself admits, he’s neither a dictator nor a king, and he can’t do much in this regard without Congress and the courts backing him.

    I just this moment saw on Fox News (naturally) Rev. Franklin Graham (son of Billy) in a discussion of Islam and terrorism. The good Rev assured Muslims that they shouldn’t worry because Jesus Christ loves them and will forgive them for their sins. Well, I guess that settles that….

    • Tom,

      However, as he himself admits, he’s neither a dictator nor a king, and he can’t do much in this regard without Congress and the courts backing him.

      Surely, you jest. In any event, if you haven’t you read Sharyl Attkisson’s book Stonewalled, linked in the first paragraph of the article, please buy it or borrow it from the library and read it.

  7. boudicabpi says:

    Reblogged this on BPI reblog and commented:
    Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam

  8. Pingback: Obama plans to restrain media offensiveness to Islam |

  9. MaddMedic says:

    Reblogged this on Freedom Is Just Another Word… and commented:
    Hello? Freedom of Speech???

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s